[slicer-users] slicer-users Digest, Vol 60, Issue 21
kikinis at bwh.harvard.edu
Fri Mar 26 07:12:00 EDT 2010
I am not a lawyer, but here is my understanding:
FDA approval is a rigorous and focused endeavor. You would not get
Slicer FDA approved, but rather get Slicer FDA approved for a specific
task or procedure. Using Slicer for something else would be "off-label" use.
FDA needs a package to be unchanged, well characterized and documented.
I would love to claim the latter two features for Slicer (you have seen
my email from yesterday) but first requirement of unchanged makes it
difficult to use Slicer as a research platform for technology research.
Finally, FDA "only" covers the the US, Slicer is used worldwide.
Having said all of this, the Slicer license would allow somebody else to
take a version of Slicer and get it FDA approved for a particular task
or procedure. This could be done without the need for additional license
On 3/25/10 11:28 PM, rk tumuluri wrote:
> Hi all,
> Apologies for this "naive question". I am "newbie" to this forum.
> Given that Slicer is largely a NIH funded initiative, what is the holdup in
> getting the requisite FDA approval.
> A commercial vendor such as ablesw claims FDA approval for
> Their comparable offering i.e "3D Doctor".
> Remember that Slicer is not FDA approved and that you need to make sure
> that you have appropriate approvals (IRB and such) if you plan to use
> Slicer to analyze patient data.
> slicer-users mailing list
> slicer-users at bwh.harvard.edu
> To unsubscribe: send email to slicer-users-request at massmail.spl.harvard.edu with unsubscribe as the subject
Ron Kikinis, M.D.,
Robert Greenes Distinguished Director of Biomedical Informatics
Professor of Radiology, Harvard Medical School
Director, Surgical Planning Laboratory
More information about the slicer-users